All competitor facts on this page were observed on 2026-07-28, with flagged pricing re-verified on 2026-07-29, from the sources linked in the footnotes. Where something is not publicly documented, we say exactly that rather than guessing. Corrections: clv.gg/contact.
Side by side
| Unabated | CLV.gg | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry paid tier | Props+ $99/mo ($83/mo billed annually) | Scout $59/mo standard ($39/mo founding) | [1][A] |
| Flagship tier | Premium $199/mo ($167/mo billed annually) | Edge $99/mo standard ($79/mo founding) | [1][A] |
| Top public tiers | Concierge $799/mo ($667/mo billed annually); API from $3,000/mo | Pro $399/mo standard ($299/mo founding); Enterprise by contact | [1][2][A] |
| Free tier | Odds screen + some tools; free odds screen covers "more than a dozen" books | Free calculators + public sample edges | [1][C] |
| Trial / guarantee | 14-day money-back guarantee | 7-day trial, card required | [1][A] |
| Book coverage | An exact count is not publicly documented | 35+ books and venues, individually named | [1][C] |
| +EV | Yes (Edge Rusher) | Yes (all tiers) | [1][A] |
| Arbitrage | Indicator only (Synthetic Hold); a dedicated arbitrage board is not publicly documented | Full arbitrage board (Operator tier and above) | [1][A] |
| CLV tracking of your bets | Calculator; automatic tracking not publicly documented | Automatic via account linking and synced slips; every settled bet graded against the close (Edge tier and above) | [1][A] |
| Bet auto-sync with book accounts | Not publicly documented | Account linking + synced slips (Edge tier and above) | [1][A] |
| Historical odds | Gated; API history caps at 1-minute resolution | Multi-year historical research layer on higher tiers; historical archives via Enterprise | [1][2][A][C] |
| Prediction markets | Sporttrade on the odds screen | Polymarket, Kalshi, plus exchanges | [1][C] |
| In-game | Yes | In-game signals in beta (Pro tier) | [1][A] |
| Speed claim | "Real time" with per-book latency indicators; API updates within 30 seconds or less for almost all books | Under 500ms streaming detection on Edge tier and above; 60s on Scout | [1][2][A] |
| Platforms | Web + Discord | Web | [1][C] |
| Public results | Survey-based member claims; no methodology page | Public edge archive: 2.4M+ logged signals, per-edge graded vs the close | [1][C] |
Neither company's speed figure is an independent benchmark; both are self-published.
Where Unabated is stronger
- Methodology credibility. Unabated is built by and around respected professional bettors (Rufus Peabody and Captain Jack Andrews), and the Unabated Line plus the Huddle feed are treated as reference points by serious bettors well beyond its own user base. If you want to learn how sharp betting actually works from first principles, this is the strongest faculty in the category. [1]
- Education for originators. Unabated's tools assume you will eventually build your own numbers, and its content teaches you to. CLV.gg hands you a sharp-consensus fair value; Unabated teaches you to question one. Those are different ambitions, and the second one is the more durable skill.
- Shipped in-game tools. Unabated's live tools are in production; CLV.gg's in-game signals are a beta on the Pro tier. [1][A]
- A free odds screen. The free tier's odds screen with per-book latency indicators is a genuinely useful zero-cost tool. [1]
Where CLV.gg is stronger
- Automated CLV tracking of your actual bets. Unabated offers a well-known CLV calculator; automatic tracking of synced bets is not publicly documented. CLV.gg links sportsbook accounts and grades every settled bet against the closing line automatically on Edge tier and above. If CLV accountability is the point, manual calculation is the difference between a diary and a ledger. [1][A]
- A public, per-edge graded record. CLV.gg's archive logs 2.4M+ signals and grades each settled edge against the close. Unabated publishes survey-based member results without a methodology page. For completeness across the category: RebelBetting publishes extensive aggregate self-reported member results and Pikkit publishes verified per-bettor leaderboards; none of the five tools we compare publishes a per-edge graded record as of 2026-07-28. [1][C]
- Named coverage including prediction markets. 35+ books and venues individually listed, including Polymarket and Kalshi. An exact Unabated book count is not publicly documented, and its prediction-market presence is Sporttrade on the odds screen. [1][C]
- A full arbitrage board. Unabated's Synthetic Hold is an indicator; CLV.gg's Operator tier carries a full arbitrage board. [1][A]
- Price at comparable depth. CLV.gg Edge at $99/mo standard is half of Unabated Premium at $199/mo. The tools are not identical, so weigh the feature lists, but the gap is factual. [1][A]
- On results claims, restraint. Unabated states that "More than 96% of our members have become winning sports bettors," a survey-based figure published without a methodology page. [1] CLV.gg makes no membership-outcome claims at all. We think the honest version of this category publishes graded data and lets you decide.
FAQ
Is Unabated better for learning?
For learning to originate your own betting numbers, yes, and we would rather say so than pretend otherwise. Its educators are among the most respected in the industry. CLV.gg's methodology page explains what the product does, but Unabated's whole identity is teaching.
Does Unabated track CLV automatically?
Its public materials document a CLV calculator. Automatic CLV tracking of synced bets is not publicly documented as of 2026-07-28. CLV.gg grades every settled synced bet against the close automatically on Edge tier and above.
Which has the better API?
They serve different buyers. Unabated's API is a standalone product starting at $3,000/mo for personal use, with history capped at 1-minute resolution. CLV.gg's Pro tier includes read-only API access at $399/mo standard, with higher-limit access via Enterprise. If you need a full odds-feed API business product, Unabated's is the bigger offering; if you want programmatic access to your own desk, CLV.gg's is the cheaper one.
Does Unabated do arbitrage?
It surfaces a Synthetic Hold indicator. A dedicated executable arbitrage board is not publicly documented. CLV.gg's full arbitrage board is on Operator tier and above.
Is the "96% winning bettors" claim true?
It is a survey-based claim published by Unabated without a methodology page, so it cannot be evaluated from outside. We note it as published and take no position beyond that. No tool, including CLV.gg, can make you a winning bettor; betting involves risk.
Can I place bets through either tool?
No. Both are analytics products. CLV.gg is not a sportsbook and does not sell picks.
Who should pick which
Pick Unabated if you want to become the kind of bettor who builds their own numbers: the education, the Unabated Line, and the sharp-market culture around it are the best classroom in the category. Also pick it if you need shipped in-game tools today or a full odds-feed API product.
Pick CLV.gg if you want the detection automated and the accountability built in: streaming edges on real-time tiers, automatic CLV grading of your synced bets, a full arbitrage board, named coverage including Polymarket and Kalshi, and a public per-edge record of how the platform's own detections graded.
CLV.gg is analytics and education only. It is not a sportsbook and it does not sell picks. Betting involves risk. Past detections do not guarantee future outcomes.
Sources
- [1]Unabated pricing and site surfaces (tier prices and annual rates re-verified 2026-07-29; the pricing page lists Props+, Premium, and Concierge): unabated.com/pricing
- [2]Unabated Game Odds API page ("starting at $3,000 per month for personal use"; book update delay "30 seconds or less"; observed 2026-07-29): unabated.com/get-unabated-api
- [A]CLV.gg pricing: clv.gg/pricing
- [C]CLV.gg public coverage registry and product summary: clv.gg/llms.txt and clv.gg