All competitor facts on this page were observed on 2026-07-28, with the published-results sources re-verified on 2026-07-29, from the sources linked in the footnotes. Where something is not publicly documented, we say exactly that rather than guessing. Corrections: clv.gg/contact.
Side by side
| RebelBetting | CLV.gg | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry paid tier | ValueBetting $99/mo ($69/mo billed annually) | Scout $59/mo standard ($39/mo founding) | [1][A] |
| Top public tier | Pro $209/mo ($139/mo billed annually) | Pro $399/mo standard ($299/mo founding) | [1][A] |
| Trial | 14 days, "no credit card required" | 7 days, card required | [1][A] |
| Book coverage | "All 100+ Bookmakers", individually named and categorized (sharp/soft/broker/exchange); EU-centric. June 2026 update removed BetMGM, ESPN BET, Hard Rock Bet, BetUS, and MyBookie. | 35+ books and venues named, including the US majors, sharps, exchanges, Polymarket, and Kalshi | [2][C] |
| Market scope | Explicitly pre-match only | Pregame markets; in-game signals in beta (Pro tier) | [2][A] |
| +EV / value betting | Core product | Core product | [1][A] |
| Arbitrage | Core product | Full arbitrage board (Operator tier and above) | [1][A] |
| Middles | Yes | Yes (Edge tier and above) | [2][A] |
| CLV tracking | Automatic for bets logged in-tool (BetTracker) | Automatic via sportsbook account linking and synced slips; every settled bet graded against the close (Edge tier and above) | [2][A] |
| Bet auto-sync with book accounts | Not publicly documented | Account linking + synced slips (Edge tier and above) | [2][A] |
| Prediction markets | Not publicly documented | Polymarket, Kalshi, plus exchanges | [2][C] |
| Speed claim | "1 million odds per minute" (throughput, not latency) | Under 500ms streaming detection on Edge tier and above; 60s on Scout | [2][A] |
| Platforms | Web + Discord | Web | [2][C] |
| Public results | The category's most extensive: a stated EUR 620,442 in member profit in the first four months of 2026, and a 333,390-bet study reporting 86.3% of platform bets generating CLV at an average of 3.11%. Self-reported from member BetTracker logs, no independent audit. | Public edge archive: 2.4M+ logged signals, per-edge graded vs the close | [3][C] |
Neither company's speed figure is an independent benchmark, and RebelBetting's "1 million odds per minute" measures throughput rather than detection latency, which are different things.
Where RebelBetting is stronger
- Results transparency, by volume. RebelBetting publishes more performance data than anyone in this category: aggregate member profit figures and a 333,390-bet CLV study. The data is self-reported from member logs and not independently audited, and we noted a currency inconsistency across its surfaces (a EUR 23M total-member-profit figure alongside a GBP 17.3M figure, observed 2026-07-29), but the willingness to publish at that scale is real and rare. [2][3]
- A written profit guarantee. RebelBetting offers a written guarantee tied to its subscription. CLV.gg offers no outcome guarantee of any kind, because edges are estimates and betting involves risk. If a written guarantee matters to you, RebelBetting is the only major tool that has one. [1]
- Cheapest full value-plus-arb entry. $69/mo billed annually for both value betting and arbitrage undercuts every comparable bundle in the category. [1]
- A no-card trial. 14 days, no credit card required, with a 50-bets/day cap. CLV.gg's 7-day trial requires a card. Their trial is the lower-friction one. [1]
- European market depth. 100+ bookmakers, individually named and usefully categorized as sharp, soft, broker, or exchange. For a bettor operating across European books, this list is the best-organized in the category. [2]
Where CLV.gg is stronger
- US book coverage. RebelBetting's June 2026 update removed BetMGM, ESPN BET, Hard Rock Bet, BetUS, and MyBookie. CLV.gg's named registry includes the US majors: DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, ESPN BET, Hard Rock Bet, and more. If your accounts are American, this is the decisive row. [2][C]
- Prediction markets. Polymarket and Kalshi are in CLV.gg's registry; prediction-market coverage is not publicly documented at RebelBetting. [2][C]
- Streaming detection. CLV.gg publishes an under-500ms detection figure on its real-time tiers. RebelBetting publishes a throughput figure (1M odds per minute) and is explicitly pre-match only. [2][A]
- Synced-slip CLV grading. RebelBetting's CLV tracking covers bets logged in its own BetTracker; auto-sync with sportsbook accounts is not publicly documented. CLV.gg links sportsbook accounts and grades every settled synced bet against the close on Edge tier and above. [2][A]
- Per-edge auditability. RebelBetting's published record is aggregate and self-reported from member logs. CLV.gg's archive is per-edge: 2.4M+ logged signals, each settled edge graded against the closing line with a timestamp. Aggregate self-reporting at RebelBetting's scale is a genuine achievement and we credit it above; a per-edge graded record is simply a different, more auditable object. [3][C]
FAQ
Is RebelBetting good for US bettors?
Increasingly less so on the evidence of its own book list: the June 2026 update removed five US-facing books including BetMGM and ESPN BET, and the coverage is EU-centric. US-focused bettors should check the current bookmaker list against their own accounts before subscribing.
Which is cheaper?
For value betting plus arbitrage together, RebelBetting at $69/mo billed annually is the cheapest full bundle in the category. CLV.gg's Scout starts at $59/mo standard ($39/mo founding) but the full arbitrage board sits on Operator ($199/mo standard). On a pure price-per-bundle basis, RebelBetting wins.
Are RebelBetting's published profit numbers real?
They are self-reported from member BetTracker logs and not independently audited, which RebelBetting's own framing reflects. That does not make them false; it makes them unverifiable from outside. We publish per-edge graded outcomes for the same underlying reason: aggregate claims are hard to audit, individual graded edges are not.
Does either tool cover live betting?
RebelBetting is explicitly pre-match only. CLV.gg's core markets are pregame, with in-game signals in beta on the Pro tier.
Does either tool guarantee profit?
RebelBetting offers a written profit guarantee tied to its subscription terms. CLV.gg does not guarantee outcomes of any kind: edges are estimates, past detections do not guarantee future results, and betting involves risk.
Can I place bets through either tool?
No. Both are analytics products. CLV.gg is not a sportsbook and does not sell picks.
Who should pick which
Pick RebelBetting if you bet European books pre-match and want value betting plus arbitrage at the lowest bundle price in the category, with a no-card trial and the most published performance data available anywhere. For that bettor it is the better and cheaper tool, plainly.
Pick CLV.gg if your accounts are at US books or on prediction markets, you want streaming detection on real-time tiers, and you want your bets and the platform's own detections graded per-edge against the closing line.
CLV.gg is analytics and education only. It is not a sportsbook and it does not sell picks. Betting involves risk. Past detections do not guarantee future outcomes.
Sources
- [1]RebelBetting pricing (observed 2026-07-28): rebelbetting.com/pricing
- [2]RebelBetting site surfaces (bookmaker list, valuebetting pages; observed 2026-07-28, re-checked 2026-07-29): rebelbetting.com and rebelbetting.com/valuebetting
- [3]RebelBetting published results: spring 2026 member profit (EUR 620,442, January to April 2026) at rebelbetting.com/blog/spring-results-2026 and the 333,390-bet CLV study (86.3% of bets generating CLV, average 3.11%) at rebelbetting.com/valuebetting/closing-line (both observed 2026-07-29)
- [A]CLV.gg pricing: clv.gg/pricing
- [C]CLV.gg public coverage registry and product summary: clv.gg/llms.txt and clv.gg